Philosophy’s burning ring of truth

John Huss is an assistant professor of philosophy at the University of Akron. His work can be found in the recently published “Johnny Cash and Philosophy,” a collection of essays he edited that explore philosophical issues by examining the life and art of the American music icon.

He says that philosophy’s method of pulling apart a person’s assumptions and following the logic behind the thinking wherever it leads is disconcerting to people. And that is just fine to him. “Philosophy, at its best, should make people uncomfortable because it is a way of getting beyond the way you normally look at things. It’s to make you realize, ‘Wow, things I thought I knew for sure can actually be doubted,'” he says.

GM: Why does the philosophical way of thinking seem foreign to most people?

JH: Most of the time, people’s notions about right and wrong and what exists or what doesn’t exist comes from one of the following: religion, tradition, how someone was raised and they might also be a social product of interactions with other people. These are sources of our beliefs.

There are reasons we hold those beliefs. Philosophy should, at its best, give you a reason to question all of that. Think about how ingrained a lot of those beliefs are. It’s much easier to go along with what your religion says about a moral issue.

It’s much easier to succumb to dogma than it is to decide that you are going to fly in the face of that dogma…The price of going against societal norms is, you could be labeled as some sort of freak…There is a huge social burden and it’s a lot easier to go with tradition. It doesn’t require as much soul searching. There is no social cost to pay. Plus, it’s not really taught.

GM: So, people are going the easier way or they are worried about consequences. But do you think that the thoughts that occur to philosophers occur to everybody?

JH: That is a good question. There is an impulse in me to say “yes,” but I want to temper that a little bit. I think there are moments when everybody might ask a philosophical question – some fundamental question about existence or a fundamental question about a right or wrong.

But the difference is that philosophers occupy themselves almost exclusively with these kinds of questions. But there are also plenty of people outside of philosophy who are preoccupied with fundamental questions and have different methods for addressing them. I really enjoy listening to historians, anthropologists and psychologists speak about some of the same topics that philosophy is interested in.

About genemyers

Gene Myers is a New Jersey poet, music journalist and columnist who learned to walk twice. His weekly column is called The Joy of Life. He was awarded first place in Arts and Entertainment Writing by The New Jersey Press Association.
This entry was posted in assumptions, beliefs, dogma, interview, John Huss, Johnny Cash, logic, norms, philosophy and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Philosophy’s burning ring of truth

  1. Justin Hamm says:

    Interesting post. I do think there are more philosophers among the regular Janes and Joes than we might think, especially those whose work is in other ways less cerebral. And by that I do mean that they “occupy themselves almost exclusively with these kinds of questions.” The difference is, maybe they don’t find themselves in the environment to express these things. But they’re still asking the fundamental questions on a daily basis.

  2. Don says:

    The constant questioning of assumptions… that’s me, dude. And it drives me crazy. Be careful, once you start, you can’t shut it off.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s